// Search News Archive

Jamey Price Photographer

We support Meals on Wheels and More...and you can too!

Inaugural Buxton's BIG TIME Bash 2012

ROAR Salon Austin

#whyAustin? Click here.

// Twitter Feed
« On To Vote Again... | Main | American Democrazy »


Tomorrow, Wednesday, June 29th, the Austin City Council will hopefully decide if the city should sponsor the Circuit of the Americas (COTA) request for a 10-year $25M sales tax rebate from the Texas Major Events Trust Fund (METF).  Normally a sponsoring entity like a city or county would commit up front their anticipated share of the sales tax gain, estimated at approximately $4M for Austin, but in this case the F1 event organizers have even committed to put up the $4M for the next 10 years, so there is basically no risk for the city of Austin taxpayers (as frequently repeated by COTA's attorney of record, Richard Suttle).

Events by Category (Click to Enlarge)

I’m not going to debate whether or not this state fund should exist, but I do think it’s important that all Texas taxpayers, and others, be aware of what it is and why it exists.  The Texas legislature created this “series” of funds (METF, ETF, SpETF, & MSRTF) to be funded by incremental sales and use tax proceeds derived from hosting major events within Texas, and yes, many other states/municipalities have similar funds to lure major events to their area, this is nothing new.  It’s actually very similar to the tax abatements offered to companies that decide to locate or re-locate their businesses to a particular city based on the overall positive economic and employment impact on the area. Think Southwestern Bell (SWB) relocating to San Antonio from St. Louis, and then SWB buying AT&T moving to Dallas, etc.  In many cases, cities actually “invest” in the development of the hosting facility itself, for example Arlington, TX contributing $325M towards the construction of the new $1.2B Cowboys Stadium (Dallas Morning News July 11, 2010).

Events by Location (Click to Enlarge)

Despite the rumors and false statements circulating that this money takes away funds from education or other state programs, which by law is impossible, these funds are designed to be self-supporting due to the anticipated incremental revenue the state receives from additional sales taxes collected during these events.  However, I do concede that if these funds did not exist, and if the events came to Texas without the “subsidy,” then that additional revenue would be available for other public funding.  But if that was the case, how many of these large events would have decided to go somewhere else where some type public funding is available?  This the primary reason these funds exist, and if the opponents are successful in eliminating these rebates for F1, then in fairness, all METF/ETF funding should be revoked, which only the state legislature can enact at this point in time.  And before you cry about the $25M for 10 years, please understand that the only “apples to apples” comparison with other METF events is the Super Bowl, which received $31M in funding last year.  This is because it shares similar attributes with F1 as the only class of event that draws tens of thousands of visitors from outside the state of Texas, and many internationally.  Remember, the key word is “incremental” revenue to the city and state.

Funding by Category (Click To Enlarge)Therefore, the real question is why would anyone oppose this funding?  I suspect if the request involved hosting the BCS Championship Bowl series at Texas Stadium for the next 10 years, not many Austinites would even bat an eye; in fact, most would bend over backwards in support.  Or if it was NASCAR or Indy Cars or the NCAA Final Four, most of the opposition wouldn’t exist.  Formula 1 and MotoGP, for that matter, are lesser known events to many folks in the U.S., and the “trial” street F1 races in Dallas, Detroit, and Los Angeles were simply one-time races on temporary street circuits.  Yes, F1 was successful at Watkins Glen, NY for twenty consecutive years and at Indianapolis Motor Speedway from 2000-2007, despite negotiations and conflict over the effective promotion of the sport, in 2008, both F1 and Indy mutually agreed to terminate their contract; that’s just business, as Trump would say.

Funding by Location (Click to Enlarge)

In an effort to give you an appreciation for the proliferation of how these funds are used, and for what types of events, I have provided this Comptroller document that lists the actual or anticipated approved expenditures since the fund creation in FY04, through FY11 (to date).  I created summary pie charts for those who are too busy to look at the data (although I highly recommend it, after all, the devil is in the details).  Please take note of a few interesting observations derived from this list.  How many of these events are organized for the benefit of private enterprise?  How many are medical group related?  How many are horse/livestock shows? NCAA or other special interest events?  Almost all of them.  Now how many were held in Austin?  Houston, Dallas/Fort Worth, San Antonio?  Maybe Austin should take a few lessons from their neighbors to the southwest; they obviously know how to "work the system.”  Bottom line if you want to debate the effectiveness or use of these funds, you should call your State Representative or Senator, not oppose the efforts to bring these events to the Austin area which will only strengthen the local economy and provide needed jobs for many.   

Formula One is the pinnacle of motorsports worldwide and it draws the attention of 600 million television viewers each year!  This is where the money is!  Only the Olympics and World Cup Soccer draw more fans, and they only occur every 4 years.  If you would have attended the Canadian Grand Prix in Montreal, as we did a few weeks back, I guarantee you would have a much greater appreciation for the economic impact of these events.  As an alternative, read about why local Montreal businesses and residents alike petitioned the city of Montreal to re-instate the race after a two-year hiatus attributed to similar questions regarding the high cost of F1 sanction fees.  It is just business; but that’s what sustains life as we know it.

If you’re still not convinced, read Will Buxton’s letter from last week to the Austin City Council again.  Or just imagine what the INTERNATIONAL television exposure could mean to Austin businesses, especially to companies like Dell, AMD, and many others that desire to expand their business globally.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (4)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    Response: 不孕不育
    思安然 安然,你 血管瘤治疗方法有哪些 是一个可爱 疾病要闻 的男孩子。你有比我还要长的睫毛,你有比我还要大的眼睛。你的小嘴巴总会不自觉的翘起,看着喜爱的我会说:"安然,你又在卖萌啦。"      安然你还是嘟着嘴,像小孩子一样。我觉得,安血管瘤治疗方法有哪些然,你真的好可爱,疾病要闻。大大的眼镜,也藏不住你乌黑的眼睛,灵动倔强 不孕不育 的黑眸。      我们的相识从聊天开始,我们的分手,也从聊天开始。或许,这对你来说,不得也不失。但是,对于我来说,原本已把你放进心底,你却硬要我把你掏出来,还给你。甚至,安然你还在质疑,我又没有
  • Response
    Response: 新闻调查
    爱你我愿一生放肆 是谁的炊烟,袅袅着升起,弥漫了心房 恋上了你的那片林,寻觅你的足迹 渴望似 门牙蛀牙青岛现最 门牙蛀牙 牛高考班:全班学生全过一本线了怎么办甘露,左右滚动,温润而剔透 葡萄胎吃什么好 柔美的笑靥,动人的秋波 醉葡萄胎吃什么好梦流淌了千年 娇羞的脸儿红了又红 摇动的心房,情波荡漾 是谁的马头琴,拨动着琴弦,癫痫,扰乱了情愫 恋上了你的那座城,白癜风,贪恋你的气息 渴望似岩浆,肝病,上下翻滚,火红而炽热 婀娜的体态,撩人的妖冶 ...
  • Response
    Response: 肝病
    你是我心中,最美的爱情! 一把有情的伞 撑起了一片,我 爱你的天地 医疗政策 伞 甲肝 下的激情,再现你我 相拥的美丽 不离不弃 相约一生的爱情承诺 就在这里,医疗政策,完成了 伟大的宣誓 你是那 风中煽情的风铃 飘动着 摇曳着你的芳姿 有风的地方,永远有你 一往情深的情怀 无时不在 施展着,你闪动 的魔力 你就是,甲肝,我心中最 美的缘 时时为 男科 我存在 ...
  • Response
    Response: 白癜风
    一枚相思,梦君颜 一曲筝歌谁解意?   弦韵千转,唯把相思系    尖锐湿疣在潜伏期有什么危害 总是在一个人的午夜   寂寞着思念。缓缓流淌的音乐   在思绪中纠缠。细数过往   的岁月,翻阅关于你我所有的情节   就这样,悄悄的回味    尖锐湿疣与假性尖锐湿疣有什么样的区别 那样一种甘甜。缱绻爱恋,来自遥远   的天涯,翩飞着晶莹的思絮   舞动着心灵的无暇。穿越千年的梦境   逶迤而至,音韵流尖锐湿疣在潜伏期有什么危害转   弦丝传情,惊动了婉约凝愁的情怀      我却听到寂静的夜里   那一声声幽幽的轻叹。我颤抖的    甲肝 手

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>